The topic of 360-Degree feedback applications can be complicated. Here, we strive to make it easier to understand.

Stakeholders invest a great deal of time providing input into a 360-degree review. There is a risk that they will feel frustrated if they provide input, but don’t see action being taken. Gathering feedback information for a 360 degree appraisal can be accomplished in a variety of ways: paper survey forms, optical scan forms (where respondents fill in bubbles with pencils), or automated data capture, such as e-mail, computer disk, or online modes. If the reason for using 360-degree feedback is clear, business-driven, and tied to conditions under which an individual is likely to be able to accept and use the feedback, then the activity will probably be successful. If the reasons are vague and event-driven, or if the feedback is threatening or thoughtless, then the 360-feedback practice will probably be unsuccessful. In the latter case the outcomes are likely to be worse than wasted time and money. The real loss may be the credibility of human resources development (HRD), which may be coupled with cynicism toward future human resources initiatives. Selecting the right mix of raters and a sufficient number of them is essential to gathering relevant and actionable 360-degree review feedback. These decisions will be informed by the employee’s particular role and their relationships within the organization. There are a number of ways to reach out to customers and involve them in a 360-degree feedback process. In the design phase of a program, input from key customers can be helpful. Input might include customers' ideas about the criteria that they feel ought to be part of the process, the expectations they have of employees or managers with whom they come in contact, and the areas in which they would like to provide feedback. They may also want to help shape the process that will be used to gather the feedback and the mechanisms that will be used to solicit their involvement. 360 degree feedbackis a must-have for organizations looking to encourage growth and development. However, it is something you shouldn't rush into. It is important to carefully consider how you will run your 360 evaluations before you kick off the project.



The boss as a reviewer has all the same needs as everyone else but they often have additional issues regarding 360 degree feedback. Traditionally it was the boss’s view that carried the day. In fact it probably was the case in the past that it was literally the only view that mattered – your job and your future totally depended on it. The boss could hire and fire, regardless of fairness, consistency, objective assessment, etc. 360 reviews have become a popular part of the continuous performance management cycle because they allow us to assess a broader picture of our behavior and skills. These can be consequently discussed in our regular employee-manager meetings. One application of 360 feedback is providing valuable insight for planning employee development courses that are well-targeted to each department's needs. HR personnel doesn't need to guess at what seminars or classes would be most appropriate: the data is right there in front of them. Single-source performance measures often are biased against older workers, women, and people of color. Preliminary research shows that multisource performance measures moderate adverse discrimination against older employees, presumably recognizing the greater experience level; are generally neutral to women; and are nearly impartial to ethnicity. Researching 360 degree feedback system is known to the best first step in determining your requirements and brushing up on your understanding in this area.

Participative Leadership

Managers usually take part in the 360-degree reviews of their direct reports. Given the close relationship between the two parties, the manager’s feedback is tracked, gathered, and delivered separately from the other reviewers. Managers generally have a deeper understanding of their direct reports than other stakeholders, and their perspective is often entirely different. Because 360 degree feedbackis about giving insights into behaviours and competencies, it can’t be used as part of a wider performance tool - instead it needs to be separate and highlight these differences. The Harvard Business Review advises that these assessments take place every quarter or even a little more widely spaced out so as to “provide a wider feedback position for the employee to take onboard training and new processes.” The same 360-degree feedback questionnaire may not end up being given to every respondent. Collecting feedback for senior management may be undertaken by concentrating on say three or more areas of strength and weakness. If you are clear what your purpose and vision is for your 360 degree feedbackthen you will likely know what will be the best “feel” and what the key messages should be. Take time to consider this strategically – just like with a business brand – and the detail will follow easily. You should create a realistic timetable for your 360 degree process and communicate. Participants, managers, and other raters need to understand the purpose and exactly what they’re expected to do. Make sure individuals know how best to embrace the multi-rater approach. Nonetheless, a keen understanding of 360 degree feedback can be seen to be a multifaceted challenge in any workplace.

According to goal-setting theory, the best goals (that is, those that best motivate and direct behaviors) are specific, difficult, and attainable. Certainly, most 360-degree feedback contains enough information for managers to choose goals that meet these criteria. If there is nothing the recipient of 360 feedback wants connected to the data you are delivering then the data will be irrelevant to them and not worth worrying about. If there is a strong connection then you can work with it – reminding of and presenting this connection is very useful and one of your tools. Although all 360-degree instruments compare self-view to the views of others, not all feedback reports use the graphic display to highlight the greatest or most significant discrepancies. Some feedback reports provide a list of items or scales following the graphic display that shows the largest self/rater difference. Another strategy, illustrated in the Executive Leadership Survey, is to sort the data into groups using self/rater discrepancy as a sorting mechanism. As organizations increasingly use 360 degree feedbackto support both development and performance management, they must remember to ask those who use the process if it adds value, is fair, and is appropriate for appraisal and pay decisions. The user safeguards can eliminate the predictable effects of potentially invalid respondent strategies, which is especially critical when using 360 degree feedbackfor performance management. Debriefing the 360 degree report is a vital part of the process. There is a serious risk to the participant and process if this doesn’t go well. For example, if it’s a poor debrief, or there is no debrief at all. In this case, it’s quite possible that the participant is left confused, hurt or even angry by negative scores or comments. Human nature means we tend to focus on the negative at the expense of positive feedback. Evaluating what is 360 degree feedback can uncover issues that may be affecting employee performance.

Aligning Vision, Values, And Competencies

Large and small companies use 360-degree reviews to boost their leaders’ confidence and to uncover areas for improvement. This type of review gives those employees who directly report to the manager as well as other colleagues a safe way to provide positive and constructive feedback in an anonymous fashion. This feedback keeps leaders be accountable for their decisions, behaviors, and impact on others. If a team member finds a piece of 360 degree feedbackunfair or unclear, managers might suggest they reach out to the feedback giver for clarification or even set up a meeting between the three of them to discuss it openly. Managers should encourage their team members to prepare open-ended questions ahead of time. The most significant insights from 360 degree reviews can be found by comparing self-perceptions to the perceptions of others. This way, an individual can clearly see their strengths and areas for development. Also, responses to open-ended questions are randomized and listed verbatim so the participant can see additional tone and context. One of the vital behaviors in a relationship is reciprocity – a mutually beneficial exchange. Performance feedback is something that is often one-sided (as in a supervisor/direct report relationship) or altogether missing (peers don’t feel it is their place to say anything). Organizations often begin the evolution to multisource systems with informal models that simply encourage managers and employees to receive feedback from internal customers. Such informal systems move the organization closer to true 360 degree feedbacksystems. In this process, employees typically recognize that the feedback that comes from a number of people contains substantial error because there are no process safeguards such as respondent anonymity and there may be unintentional or intentional respondent biases. Experience shows that the 360 degree feedbackprocess must be formalized to ensure fairness and accuracy. Keeping up with the latest developments regarding 360 appraisal is a pre-cursor to Increased employee motivation and building the link between performance and rewards.

Small businesses get the benefit of identifying potential problems before they become serious enough to impact business operations. 360 degree feedback allows managers and other leadership to identify and address early warning signs for issues such as low productivity or declining performance. Few people have ever previously received feedback about the accuracy of their judgments about others, except possibly from their spouse or significant other. Most of those who receive respondent feedback are delighted, and possibly relieved, when their judgment matches others. Respondent feedback is welcome for most people. When giving 360 degree feedback, give your employees a chance to respond to your comments so you can see it from their perspective and properly address the situation. Remember your job is to give them perspective on their actions. Give suggestions of ways they could adjust their performance and ask what steps they think they could take. If you are one of the recipients in a 360 review, you want to note down the most common patterns in the feedback. For example, 8 out of 10 respondents noticed that you have been more in control of handling multiple tasks. More than half said you allocated time to each task of yours reasonably and hardly felt behind. This is the pattern for good time management skills. Look for patterns like this one and note them down. We all seek feedback from the people around us, and yet most people don't give enough. This makes for an unequal equation: demand far outstrips supply, and yet the supply is really there. A goal of a development program should be to show individuals the absolute necessity in giving good feedback to their subordinates, their peers, and their boss. When a program gives participants the chance to practice giving feedback, their relationships with their co-workers back home will be more effective. Supporting the big vision encompassing 360 feedback software will lead to untold career development initiatives.

Increased Employee Motivation

Performance coaching is a useful developmental application since feedback targeted on behavioral competencies or job skills helps each associate build an intelligent action plan based on the information. The 360 degree feedbackprocess creates credible behavior feedback that can be used in lieu of a performance coach to target action planning. The definition of paradigm shift is “a fundamental change in one’s assumptions, approach or the way of thinking, driven by agents of change. It is transformational”. This is a phenomenon of change that can be observed and experienced but, by definition, it cannot be controlled or forced. Due to trust issues, 360 degree feedbackcan cease to be used for development, where it’s actually helpful. Instead it becomes used by individuals and leaders as a way to evidence performance. There is a risk that 360 degree feedbacksimply becomes an administrative burden for teams and organizations and that it provides little real value. Discover extra particulars appertaining to 360-Degree feedback applications on this NHS entry.

Related Articles:

Further Information On 360-Degree feedback expectations
Additional Findings With Regard To 360 review systems
Supplementary Findings With Regard To 360 appraisal systems
Supplementary Information About 360 appraisal applications
More Background Insight On 360 degree evaluation software systems
More Background Information With Regard To 360 degree review initiatives
Extra Information With Regard To 360-Degree appraisal expectations